ESS Sabre vs. Cirrus Logic Architecture, Specs, & Sound Signatures
DAC

ESS Sabre vs. Cirrus Logic: Architecture, Specs, & Sound Signatures

The high-fidelity audio landscape shifted sharply following the 2020 AKM factory fire, forcing Digital Audio Player (DAP) and dongle manufacturers into two camps: ESS Technology and Cirrus Logic. While both companies engineer Delta-Sigma DACs, they prioritize opposing metrics.

Note: If you buy something from our links, we might earn a commission. See our affiliate disclosure statement.

ESS chases dynamic range records through its HyperStream architecture, often sacrificing power efficiency for raw mathematical precision. Cirrus Logic, carrying the torch of its Wolfson heritage, targets low-power integration and phase linearity.

We examine the specific engineering choices—from ASRC resampling to Class H amplification—that dictate whether a device sounds analytical or natural.

Comparing ESS Sabre vs. Cirrus Logic Specs | SoundMaxPro

Comparing ESS Sabre vs. Cirrus Logic Specs

Two semiconductor giants dominate the way we hear digital music. One chases mathematical perfection through metrics. The other pursues efficiency and organic system integration. Here is the definitive breakdown.

By Audio Research Team

The high-fidelity audio landscape changed drastically following the AKM factory fire in 2020. Manufacturers of Digital Audio Players (DAPs), dongles, and desktop stacks had to pick a side. This consolidated the market into two distinct camps: ESS Technology and Cirrus Logic. While both companies produce Delta-Sigma DACs, their engineering philosophies diverge sharply.

ESS Technology focuses on the “HyperStream” architecture. They prioritize dynamic range (DNR) and total harmonic distortion (THD) numbers that break records. Their flagship chips are often found in studio equipment and high-end desktop units where power consumption is secondary to raw performance.

Cirrus Logic, heavily influenced by their acquisition of Wolfson Microelectronics, emphasizes “MasterHIFI”. Their strategy targets the mobile and portable market. They prioritize low power consumption, ease of implementation for system integrators, and a tuning often described as more “natural” or “analog-like”.

Live Rendering: Visualizing Jitter Handling (ASRC vs PLL)

1. Architecture: HyperStream vs. Mismatch Shaping

The core difference lies in how these chips handle modulation. ESS uses a proprietary HyperStream IV modulator. Standard modulators become unstable at high modulation indices. ESS designed theirs to handle 100% modulation depth. This allows for aggressive handling of transient signals, contributing to the “explosive” dynamics often attributed to the Sabre sound.

Cirrus Logic relies on advanced Mismatch Shaping within a multi-bit Delta-Sigma framework. In any multi-bit DAC, manufacturing variances create tiny errors between capacitors or resistors. Cirrus uses algorithms to rapidly rotate which elements are used. This averages out the errors and pushes distortion into ultrasonic frequencies. The result is a highly linear response without aggressive feedback loops.

2. The Jitter Solution

How the chip handles a messy digital clock signal defines its clarity.

ESS: Time Domain Jitter Eliminator

ESS uses an Asynchronous Sample Rate Converter (ASRC). It effectively ignores the incoming clock and resamples the audio data to its own internal high-speed clock. This makes ESS chips nearly immune to bad sources (like a cheap TV optical output), but purists argue it alters the original timing data.

Cirrus: Clock Clean-up (PLL)

Cirrus employs a Phase Locked Loop. It generates a new, clean clock that tracks the average frequency of the source but filters out rapid jitter. This maintains the synchronous relationship with the source file, which some argue preserves better time-domain integrity.

3. The Wolfson Heritage

To understand the “Cirrus Sound,” one must look at history. In 2014, Cirrus Logic acquired Wolfson Microelectronics, a Scottish firm legendary for the “Wolfson Warmth” found in early iPods and Astell&Kern players (specifically the WM8740 chip).

Modern Cirrus chips like the CS43198 are spiritual successors to Wolfson architecture. They prioritize “pre-ringing” reduction. Pre-ringing is an artifact of digital filters where an echo appears before a sharp sound (like a snare drum hit). While inaudible in steady tones, the human ear finds pre-ringing unnatural because echoes don’t travel backward in time in nature. Cirrus tuning minimizes this, resulting in the perceived “analog” smoothness.

4. Digital Filters: The Shape of Sound

Both manufacturers allow listeners to shape the sound via digital filters, but their defaults reveal their priorities. ESS offers granularity with up to 8 distinct shapes, while Cirrus focuses on phase linearity.

Minimum Phase (ESS Preference)

Pre-ringing: None
Post-ringing: Long
Impact: Punchy bass, sharp imaging.

ESS chips often default to or encourage Minimum Phase filters. By eliminating the unnatural “pre-echo,” transients hit harder. This creates the “Sabre Slam” often cited in bass reviews.

Linear Phase (Cirrus Preference)

Pre-ringing: Moderate
Post-ringing: Moderate
Impact: Precise tonality, wide stage.

Cirrus implementations often stick to Linear Phase Slow Roll-off. This preserves the phase relationship of all frequencies (bass doesn’t arrive slower than treble), creating a cohesive, “correct” soundstage at the cost of transient sharpness.

5. Interactive Analysis: Specs vs. Reality

Below is a direct comparison of the current market leaders as of late 2025: the ESS ES9039Q2M and the Cirrus Logic CS43131.

Feature ESS ES9039Q2M Cirrus Logic CS43131
Primary Market High-End Portable / Desktop Mobile Dongles / Smartphones
Dynamic Range (DNR) ~129 dB (Native) 130 dB (with Class H Gain)
THD+N -120 dB -115 dB
Power Consumption Moderate (Heat generated) Ultra-Low (6.25 mW)
Headphone Amp None (Requires ext. Op-Amp) Integrated (2 Vrms)
Output Impedance Dependent on external Amp High (needs careful PCB layout)
Digital Filters 7-8 Selectable Filters 5 Filters + NOS Emulation
Sound Signature Analytical, Sharp, Revealing Natural, Musical, Forgiving

6. The Integrator’s Dilemma: Heat & Power

For dongle manufacturers (like iBasso, Shanling, or Cayin), the choice of chip dictates the physical design.

The “System-on-Chip” approach (Cirrus): The CS43131 is unique because it integrates the headphone amplifier directly into the silicon. This drastically reduces board space and power draw (approx 6.25mW quiescent). It allows for dongles that don’t drain the host phone’s battery. However, it limits the manufacturer’s ability to “color” the sound with custom amplification.

The “Component Heavy” approach (ESS): The ES9039Q2M is a pure DAC. It requires separate Operational Amplifiers (Op-Amps) for voltage conversion and buffering. This consumes more power (often 80mW+) and generates heat, but allows engineers to swap Op-Amps (e.g., OPA1612 vs AD8397) to tune the final audio flavor. This is why ESS dongles are often physically larger and run warmer.

7. The Secret Weapon: Harmonic Compensation

One feature separates the “good” ESS implementations from the “legendary” ones: 2nd and 3rd Harmonic Compensation. In high-end chips like the ES9039PRO, ESS provides registers that allow the manufacturer to manually adjust the distortion levels.

In analog circuits, the 2nd harmonic (even order) adds warmth, while the 3rd harmonic (odd order) adds grit or hardness. By using these compensation registers, skilled engineers can:

  • Nullify distortion completely to chase perfect measurements (SINAD).
  • Intentionally leave in a specific amount of 2nd harmonic to mimic the sound of tube amplifiers.

This programmability is why two different devices using the exact same ESS chip can sound completely different. Cirrus Logic chips generally do not offer this level of granular distortion manipulation, relying instead on their fixed “MasterHIFI” tuning.

8. Mobile Power: Class H vs. External Rails

How does a tiny Cirrus chip drive heavy headphones without draining your battery? The answer is Class H Amplification. The CS43131 contains an intelligent power supply that tracks the music signal. If the music is quiet, it drops the voltage rail. If a loud bass drum hits, it momentarily spikes the voltage to provide power.

Efficiency Visualization

ESS (Standard)
~85mW
Cirrus (Class H)
~20mW

Typical idle power consumption for a 32-bit/384kHz playback scenario.

9. The Artifacts: Humps and Glare

No chip is perfect. The “ESS IMD Hump” was a notorious issue in previous generations (ES9038) where distortion would spike at mid-volume levels. While ESS has largely fixed this in the ES9039 series, the reputation persists. The ESS sound is also sometimes associated with “Sabre Glare,” a perceived brightness in the treble caused by transient overshoot in their default digital filters.

Cirrus Logic faces the “DRE Hump.” To achieve high dynamic range numbers, they use Dynamic Range Enhancement (DRE), which switches gain states. This switching can cause a distortion spike at the crossover point. However, Cirrus chips offer a unique feature: NOS (Non-Oversampling) Emulation. This mode bypasses ringing filters entirely, offering a pristine time-domain response that many listeners find cures digital fatigue.

10. Evolution of the Silicon

2016
ESS ES9018

The chip that started the “high res” craze in smartphones (LG V20). Known for high detail but prone to “glare”.

2018
Cirrus CS43131

Revolutionized dongles by integrating the amp. Brought 130dB DNR to $50 price points.

2021
ESS ES9038Q2M

The workhorse of the post-fire era. Incredible specs, but required careful engineering to tame the “IMD Hump”.

2023
ESS ES9039 Series

HyperStream IV introduced. Lower power consumption and hardware MQA rendering removed.

11. The Listening Room

How do you actually hear the difference? Use these tracks to spot the signature characteristics of each chipset.

Test for ESS “Precision”

Track: “Bubbles” by Yosi Horikawa

Listen to the bouncing balls hitting the floor. On an ESS chip, the initial impact (transient) should sound startlingly sharp and the location of each ball should be pinpoint precise.

Test for Cirrus “Timbre”

Track: “Keith Don’t Go” by Nils Lofgren

Focus on the decay of the acoustic guitar strings. On a Cirrus chip, the fade-out often feels longer and warmer, preserving the resonance of the wood body better than the drier ESS presentation.

Find Your Chipset

Select your primary use case to see our recommendation.

Recommendation: ESS Sabre (ES9039PRO/Q2M)

You need absolute transparency. The ESS architecture digs deeper into the noise floor. Look for devices like the FiiO K9 Pro or high-end Matrix Audio streamers. The separation will help you dissect mixes.

Recommendation: Cirrus Logic (CS43131)

For listening on the go, the “Cirrus Warmth” is more forgiving of road noise and imperfect streaming quality. Devices like the iBasso DC04 Pro offer a great balance of power and musicality.

Recommendation: Cirrus Logic (CS43131/43198)

The efficiency is unmatched. Cirrus chips sip power (6.25mW quiescent), meaning your phone battery won’t drain while driving your IEMs. ESS chips generally run hotter and draw more current.

Recommendation: ESS Sabre

Competitive gaming requires precise imaging to locate footsteps. The sharp transient response and “holographic” soundstage of the ESS Sabre provide a tactical advantage over the softer Cirrus presentation.

12. Real-World Implementation Guide

Specs are theoretical. Here is how major manufacturers are deploying these chips in 2024-2025.

Device Tier ESS Implementation Cirrus Implementation
Budget Dongle ($50) FiiO KA11 (ES9219C)
Sharp, powerful, runs warm.
Apple USB-C Adapter
Clean, low volume, stays cool.
Mid-Fi ($150-$300) Shanling UA5 (Dual ES9038Q2M)
Hybrid power mode, aggressive detail.
iBasso DC04 Pro (Dual CS43131)
Detailed yet organic, app control.
Flagship DAPs ($1k+) FiiO M17 (Dual ES9038PRO)
Desktop-class performance in hand.
Astell&Kern SR35 (Quad CS43198)
Switchable Quad-DAC mode, fluid UI.

13. Frequently Asked Questions

Generally, no. The implementation of the analog output stage (the amplifier) and the power supply filtering has a larger impact on the final sound than the specific DAC chip model. A well-implemented CS43131 can sound better than a poorly implemented ES9038PRO.

It is a subjective term describing a hardness or artificial brightness in the treble frequencies. It is often attributed to pre-ringing in the digital filters or high-order harmonic distortion in early ESS implementations. Newer chips (9039 series) have largely mitigated this.

Yes, on some advanced devices. The hump is caused by Dynamic Range Enhancement (DRE). Some manufacturers (like TRN or iBasso) allow users to disable DRE via firmware or an app. This lowers the theoretical DNR spec but linearizes the distortion performance.

NOS stands for Non-OverSampling. Most DACs oversample the signal to smooth out the stairsteps of digital data. NOS mode skips this, presenting the raw data. It rolls off treble significantly (sounding darker) but provides perfect time-domain response with zero ringing.

Audio Dictionary

SINAD

Signal-to-Noise and Distortion ratio. A combined metric of signal quality. Higher is better. >115dB is transparent to human ears.

Jitter

Timing errors in the digital clock. High jitter causes a “smeared” or fuzzy soundstage. Measured in picoseconds (ps).

Impedance

Resistance to electrical current. High output impedance in a DAC can mess up the frequency response of sensitive IEMs.

Delta-Sigma

The modern method of converting digital to analog using very high speed 1-bit or multi-bit switching and noise shaping.

SoundMaxPro

Independent Audio Analysis. © 2025 SoundMaxPro. All rights reserved.

Comparison data based on manufacturer datasheets and independent measurements of ES9039 and CS43131 series.

Affiliate Disclosure: Soundmaxpro.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

What's your reaction?

Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0

You may also like